As published in The County Times (countytimes.somd.com)
By Ronald N. Guy Jr.
Caitlin Clark played her last game for the University
of Iowa on April 5, 2024. Ten days
later, she was drafted first overall in the NBA draft by the Indiana
Fever. On May 14th, she
played her first WNBA game.
Hold that thought.
Between all of this, and in the few weeks that have
followed, all fire and brimstone from the biblical place down below has broken
loose. The figurative first punch to Clark’s
nose came from WNBA legend Diana Taurasi, who spitefully predicted that Clark
was about to get served a helping of humble pie from the WNBA’s elite
talent. Angel Reese, a college rival of
Clark and never one to bite her tongue, has trolled Clark on social media – the
sport within the sport.
It’s easy to shout down Taurasi and Reese and scoff at
the shallow mistreatment of Clark, a magic bean whose skills and broad appeal
offer the WNBA an unprecedented chance to grow women’s basketball to unforeseen
- perhaps even unimaginable, for some - levels.
Taurasi’s prediction wreaks of an aging star who is unwilling to yield
the stage to Clark. For Reese, jealousy is
the apparent psychological quirk she can’t quite suppress, not that she’s inclined
to do so.
Hang on, I need a sip of this truth serum. Mmm…delicious. So here it is: I love Taurasi’s and Reese’s
reactions to Clark mania. I love the pettiness,
the competitiveness, the disregard for hurt feelings or public chastising. This is professional basketball - competition
at the highest level. The chummy nature
of the modern NBA - and the NFL and MLB while I’m at it – is irritating. Defeats are often casually accepted. There are too many bro-hugs immediately after
tough games for my liking. I yearn for
the old rivals from years ago – Lakers v. Celtics, Bulls v. Bad Boy Pistons,
‘Skins v. Cowboys. Professionalism and
mutual respect can co-exist with genuine disdain for an opponent. Animosity also makes for better theater. It gives fans an option to identify their
good and their evil and watch those forces collide on the field, the court, the
diamond or the ice.
Tip of the cap to Taurasi and Reese.
Back to that thought I asked to you hold. Do you see an issue with Clark’s transition
to the WNBA? Imagine your college season
ending, getting drafted and playing your first game with a new team, in a new
city, with a professional organization in 40 days. Teammates are strangers. The competition has been turned up several
notches. Nothing is familiar. The pressure is palatable. Good luck.
Does this seem sane?
WNBA players have been doing this for years. Is any men’s sport like this? None of the majors are. NFL draftees report to minicamp in May, then
training camp in July. Several
pre-season games follow. Their first
real games occur five months after being drafted. MLB and NHL draftees typically spend years in
the minors. The NBA draft happens in
June, select draftees participate in the summer league and the season doesn’t
start until November. These are rational
approaches for young players to adapt to the biggest athletic, professional and
perhaps psychological challenge of their lives.
Clark, Reese and darn near every other WNBA player, get about a month to
go from college student to pro.
I get it to a certain extent. The sports calendar is full; to maximize eyes
on television screens and butts in seats – i.e. revenue - seasons are
strategically scheduled. If player wellness
was part of the equation, the suggestion of starting a season a month after the
college season ends would get laughed out of the C-suite conference room. But it’s routine for the WNBA. So, it’s no wonder Clark’s WNBA transition
has been choppy. She’ll be fine. Reese will be fine. Not all women have been or will be, though. So how about we give them all a break – for
choppy play, for early struggles, for moments of pride or jealousy – even if
they don’t go easy on each other. The
reality is they’ve been dealt an unfair hand, which is, unfortunately, nothing
new for female athletes.
No comments:
Post a Comment